Effect of continuous exenatide infusion on cardiac function and peri‐operative glucose control in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A single‐blind, randomized controlled trial

We performed a randomized controlled trial with the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonist exenatide as add‐on to standard peri‐operative insulin therapy in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The aims of the study were to intensify peri‐operative glucose control while minimizing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes, obesity & metabolism Vol. 19; no. 12; pp. 1818 - 1822
Main Authors Lipš, Michal, Mráz, Miloš, Kloučková, Jana, Kopecký, Petr, Dobiáš, Miloš, Křížová, Jarmila, Lindner, Jaroslav, Diamant, Michaela, Haluzík, Martin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2017
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI10.1111/dom.13029

Cover

More Information
Summary:We performed a randomized controlled trial with the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonist exenatide as add‐on to standard peri‐operative insulin therapy in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The aims of the study were to intensify peri‐operative glucose control while minimizing the risk of hypoglycaemia and to evaluate the suggested cardioprotective effects of GLP‐1‐based treatments. A total of 38 patients with decreased left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction ≤50%) scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were randomized to receive either exenatide or placebo in a continuous 72‐hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on top of standard peri‐operative insulin therapy. While no significant difference in postoperative echocardiographic variables was found between the groups, participants receiving exenatide showed improved peri‐operative glucose control as compared with the placebo group (average glycaemia 6.4 ± 0.5 vs 7.3 ± 0.8 mmol/L; P < .001; percentage of time in target range of 4.5–6.5 mmol/L 54.8% ± 14.5% vs 38.6% ± 14.4%; P = .001; percentage of time above target range 39.7% ± 13.9% vs 52.8% ± 15.2%; P = .009) without an increased risk of hypoglycaemia (glycaemia <3.3 mmol/L: 0.10 ± 0.32 vs 0.21 ± 0.42 episodes per participant; P = .586). Continuous administration of i.v. exenatide in patients undergoing elective CABG could provide a safe option for intensifying the peri‐operative glucose management of such patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.13029