Negative workplace behavior and coping strategies among nurses: A cross‐sectional study

Negative workplace behavior affecting nurses is an internationally recognized problem. This study examines the types and extent of negative workplace behavior experienced by nurses in non‐metropolitan, regional acute care settings and their ways of coping when subject to that behavior. A cross‐secti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNursing & health sciences Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 123 - 135
Main Authors Hawkins, Natasha, Jeong, Sarah, Smith, Tony
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01.03.2021
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1441-0745
1442-2018
1442-2018
DOI10.1111/nhs.12769

Cover

More Information
Summary:Negative workplace behavior affecting nurses is an internationally recognized problem. This study examines the types and extent of negative workplace behavior experienced by nurses in non‐metropolitan, regional acute care settings and their ways of coping when subject to that behavior. A cross‐sectional study was conducted involving 74 nurse participants in four regional hospitals in Australia. The structured questionnaire consisted of four parts: demographic questions, the Negative Acts Questionnaire – Revised, questions on exposure to bullying and/or incivility and policy awareness and use of pathways, and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Overall, 34% of participants were exposed to bullying and 49% to incivility over the previous month. The most common type of negative workplace behavior reported was “work‐related bullying,” which included exposure to excessive workloads, unrealistic deadlines, and information being withheld. Nurses reported the use of a variety of coping mechanisms, including problem‐focused coping strategies and seeking social support. The findings imply that negative workplace behaviors occur not only at individual nursesʼ level but also derive from the broader contexts of organizational management and systemic factors.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1441-0745
1442-2018
1442-2018
DOI:10.1111/nhs.12769