Left atrial appendage occlusion in chicken‐wing anatomies: Imaging assessment, procedural, and clinical outcomes of the “sandwich technique”

• Published in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions Vol. 97; no. 7; pp. E1025 - E1032
• Main Authors: Freixa, Xavier, Tzikas, Apostolos, Aminian, Adel, Flores‐Umanzor, Eduardo, De Backer, Ole, Korsholm, Kasper, Ben Yedder, Mohamed, Gonzalez‐Ferreiro, Rocío, Agudelo‐Montañez, Victor, Gilhofer, Thomas, Simon, François, Samaras, Athanasios, Regueiro, Ander, Sondergaard, Lars, Cruz‐Gonzalez, Ignacio, Arzamendi, Dabit, Saw, Jacqueline, Ibrahim, Reda, Nielsen‐Kudsk, Jens Erik
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.06.2021; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Antiplatelet therapy; atrial fibrillation; chicken wing; Clinical outcomes; Echocardiography; Heart; left atrial appendage; Occlusion; Patients; sandwich technique; Sandwiches; Tamponade; Thrombosis; sandwich technique; atrial fibrillation; chicken wing; left atrial appendage
• ISSN: 1522-1946; 1522-726X; 1522-726X
• DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29546

Objectives To describe imaging assessment, procedural and follow‐up outcome of patients undergoing left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion (LAAO) using a “sandwich” technique. Background The presence of a LAA with chicken wing morphology constitutes a challenge that sometimes requires specific occlusion strategies like the “sandwich” technique. However, procedural and follow‐up data focusing on this implanting strategy is scarce. Methods This multicenter study collected individual data from eight centers between 2012 and 2019. Consecutive patients with chicken‐wing LAAs defined as an early (<20 mm from the ostium) and severe bend (>90°) who underwent LAAO with Amplatzer devices and using the “sandwich” technique were included in the analysis. Results Overall, 190 subjects were enrolled in the study. Procedures were done with the Amulet device (85%) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (15%). Successful implantation was achieved in 99.5% with ≤1 partial recapture in 80% of cases. Single (46.2%) and dual antiplatelet therapy (39.4%) were the most used antithrombotic therapies after LAAO. In‐hospital major adverse events rate was 1.5% with no deaths. One patient (0.5%) had cardiac tamponade requiring percutaneous drainage. With a mean follow‐up of 19.6 ± 14.8 months, the mortality and stroke rates were 7.7%/year and 2.5%/year, respectively. Follow‐up transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at 2–3 months showed device‐related thrombosis in 2.8% and peri‐device leak ≥3 mm in 1.2% of patients. Conclusions In a large series of patients with chicken wing LAA anatomies undergoing LAAO, the use of the “sandwich” technique was feasible and safe. Preprocedural imaging was a key‐factor to determine specific measurements.