SAPIEN valve for percutaneous transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement without “pre‐stenting”: A multi‐institutional experience

Objectives To describe a multicenter experience of percutaneous transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) using the Edwards SAPIEN S3 valve without the use of a prior stent (“pre‐stenting”). Background The SAPIEN S3 and XT valves have durable cobalt–chromium stent frames which may allow for T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions Vol. 93; no. 2; pp. 324 - 329
Main Authors Morgan, Gareth J., Sadeghi, Soraya, Salem, Moris M., Wilson, Neil, Kay, Joseph, Rothman, Abraham, Galindo, Alvaro, Martin, Mary Hunt, Gray, Robert, Ross, Michael, Aboulhosn, Jamil A., Levi, Daniel Steven
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.02.2019
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1522-1946
1522-726X
1522-726X
DOI10.1002/ccd.27932

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objectives To describe a multicenter experience of percutaneous transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) using the Edwards SAPIEN S3 valve without the use of a prior stent (“pre‐stenting”). Background The SAPIEN S3 and XT valves have durable cobalt–chromium stent frames which may allow for TPVR in large diameter dysfunctional right ventricular outflow tracts (RVOTs) without pre‐stenting the landing zone. Methods A retrospective review was performed of all patients with Congenital Heart Disease and dysfunctional RVOT who underwent TPVR using the SAPIEN valve without the use of a pre‐stent. Imaging data, procedural elements, and clinical follow‐up data were collected to evaluate short and intermediate‐term results. Results Fifty‐seven patients underwent percutaneous placement of the SAPIEN valve in the pulmonary position without the use of pre‐stenting. The anatomical substrate varied: native RVOTs (n = 41), conduits (n = 10), and bioprosthetic valves (n = 6). There were no cases in which the valve could not be implanted and no cases of valve embolization or misplacement. On follow‐up (range 1 month to 2.2 years, median 5.3 months), no patients had significant obstruction or regurgitation around the valve. There were no frame fractures. There were no procedural deaths. Major complications included severe aortic compression (n = 1) requiring surgical explantation and tricuspid valve injury requiring surgical intervention (n = 2). Conclusions This limited multi‐institutional experience demonstrates that the SAPIEN valve can be used for TPVR without the use of a pre‐stent without medium‐term risk of frame fracture, paravalvar leak, or embolization. Longer term follow‐up is required to fully assess this method.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.27932