Correlation Between the “seeing FWHM” of Satellite Optical Observations and Meteorological Data at the OWL-Net Station, Mongolia

The correlation between meteorological data collected at the optical wide-field patrol network (OWL-Net) Station No. 1 and the seeing of satellite optical observation data was analyzed. Meteorological data and satellite optical observation data from June 2014 to November 2015 were analyzed. The anal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of astronomy and space sciences Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 137 - 146
Main Authors Bae, Young-Ho, Jo, Jung Hyun, Yim, Hong-Suh, Park, Young-Sik, Park, Sun-Youp, Moon, Hong Kyu, Choi, Young-Jun, Jang, Hyun-Jung, Roh, Dong-Goo, Choi, Jin, Park, Maru, Cho, Sungki, Kim, Myung-Jin, Choi, Eun-Jung, Park, Jang-Hyun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 한국우주과학회 15.06.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2093-5587
2093-1409
DOI10.5140/JASS.2016.33.2.137

Cover

More Information
Summary:The correlation between meteorological data collected at the optical wide-field patrol network (OWL-Net) Station No. 1 and the seeing of satellite optical observation data was analyzed. Meteorological data and satellite optical observation data from June 2014 to November 2015 were analyzed. The analyzed meteorological data were the outdoor air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and cloud index data, and the analyzed satellite optical observation data were the seeing full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) data. The annual meteorological pattern for Mongolia was analyzed by collecting meteorological data over four seasons, with data collection beginning after the installation and initial set-up of the OWL-Net Station No. 1 in Mongolia. A comparison of the meteorological data and the seeing of the satellite optical observation data showed that the seeing degrades as the wind strength increases and as the cloud cover decreases. This finding is explained by the bias effect, which is caused by the fact that the number of images taken on the less cloudy days was relatively small. The seeing FWHM showed no clear correlation with either temperature or relative humidity.
Bibliography:G704-000106.2016.33.2.009
ISSN:2093-5587
2093-1409
DOI:10.5140/JASS.2016.33.2.137