Electromagnetic field for supramaximal muscle stimulation: A retrospective study of safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction in Brazil

• Published in: Journal of cosmetic dermatology Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 1266 - 1272
• Main Authors: Sant'Ana, Estela, Meleck, Michelle, Ferrari, Priscila, Padovan, Rogerio, Camargo, Carla, Godoi, Silvana, Assis, Lívia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.04.2023
• Subjects: Abdomen; Abdominal Muscles - physiology; Adolescent; Adult; Aesthetics; Brazil; electromagnetic field; Electromagnetic Fields; Esthetics; Exercise; High density lipoprotein; HI‐SMS; Humans; Magnetic Field Therapy - methods; Middle Aged; Muscle Contraction - physiology; muscle stimulation; non‐invasive body contouring; Patient Satisfaction; Retrospective Studies; supramaximal muscle contraction; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; Brazil; non-invasive body contouring; HI-SMS; muscle stimulation; electromagnetic field; supramaximal muscle contraction
• ISSN: 1473-2130; 1473-2165; 1473-2165
• DOI: 10.1111/jocd.15606

Background Currently, even individuals who do physical activity regularly have some degree of dissatisfaction with their own bodies. The electromagnetic field for supramaximal muscle contraction has been the subject of research. High‐intensity supramaximal muscle stimulation (HI‐SMS) is a non‐invasive technology used to strengthen, firm, and tone the abdominal muscles, arms, buttocks, and thighs and has been indicated for aesthetic purposes. Aims The present study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of HI‐SMS used in the abdominal muscles of patients through the analysis of clinical evaluation, biochemical serum profile, and patient satisfaction with the procedure. Patients/Methods This is retrospective non‐randomized and non‐controlled study collected in a private clinic; all data from healthy participants (n = 25), aged between 18 and 55 years, were compiled and analyzed. All received eight 30 min sessions of electromagnetic field ONIX HI‐SMS (intensity of the 90%–100%) located in abdominal, twice a week with intervals of 2–3 days. Results The results show that BMI, fat thickness, and waist circumference improved the body contour after the treatment. There was no statistical difference in the data referring to the values of AST, ALT, ALP, creatinine, cholesterol, LDL‐C, VLDL‐C, HDL‐C, glycemia, LDH, CK, and IL‐6. However, there was a reduction of “non‐esterified” free fatty acids when compared to baseline. This treatment provided high levels of tolerance, comfort, and high level of satisfaction. Conclusions Thus, it can be suggested that the treatment with HI‐SMS in abdominal muscles proves to be a safe technology with potential for non‐invasive therapy for aesthetic purposes.