D-optimal designs for mixed discrete and continuous outcomes analyzed using nonlinear models

Many dose-response experiments in toxicology and other biological sciences are designed to measure multiple outcomes. Unfortunately, most of these studies are powered or designed for a single response, and the inference on the under-powered endpoints is limited. As additional design challenges, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. 78 - 95
Main Authors Coffey, T, Gennings, C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Statistical Association and the International Biometric Society 01.03.2007
American Statistical Association
International Biometric Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1085-7117
1537-2693
DOI10.1198/108571107X177735

Cover

More Information
Summary:Many dose-response experiments in toxicology and other biological sciences are designed to measure multiple outcomes. Unfortunately, most of these studies are powered or designed for a single response, and the inference on the under-powered endpoints is limited. As additional design challenges, the outcomes may have different regions and shapes of activity or have different response types. As a new application to the traditional D-optimality criterion, we have developed optimal designs for mixed discrete and continuous outcomes that are analyzed with nonlinear models. These designs use a numerical algorithm to choose the location of the dose groups and proportion of total sample size allocated to each group that minimize the generalized variance of a model-based covariance matrix that incorporates the correlation between outcomes. Using this methodology, we designed a dose-response experiment with binary, count, and continuous outcomes to evaluate neurotoxicity. In this example, the optimal designs placed dose groups at the predicted dose thresholds and throughout the active range. The designs were generally robust to different correlation structures. In addition, when the expected correlation was moderate or large, we observed a substantial gain in efficiency compared to optimal designs created for each outcome separately.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1085-7117
1537-2693
DOI:10.1198/108571107X177735