Investigation of intermediate sulfur species during pyrite oxidation in the presence and absence of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans

The intermediate sulfur species of pyrite chemical and biological oxidation have been the subject of controversy for some time, especially the question of whether or not elemental sulfur (S0) and polythionates (SnO62−) are formed during the oxidation process. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (A. ferro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHydrometallurgy Vol. 167; pp. 58 - 65
Main Authors Tu, Zhihong, Guo, Chuling, Zhang, Ting, Lu, Guining, Wan, Jingjing, Liao, Changjun, Dang, Zhi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.01.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0304-386X
1879-1158
DOI10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.11.001

Cover

More Information
Summary:The intermediate sulfur species of pyrite chemical and biological oxidation have been the subject of controversy for some time, especially the question of whether or not elemental sulfur (S0) and polythionates (SnO62−) are formed during the oxidation process. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (A. ferrooxidans), one of the most common sulfur-oxidizing bacterial strains, has been shown to remarkably accelerate pyrite oxidation. In this study, the intermediate products of pyrite oxidation with and without A. ferrooxidans present were compared by employing different analytical techniques; i.e., high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The HPLC results showed that the concentrations of S0, S3O62−, S4O62−, S5O62− and S6O62− increased during pyrite oxidation process in the presence of A. ferrooxidans. Secondary minerals jarosite (KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6) and iron(III) oxide-hydroxide (FeOOH) were also detected by XRD and XPS. Without A. ferrooxidans, S0 was also formed and along with S3O62−, S4O62− and S5O62− but only at very low concentrations at the end of the experiment. SEM micrographs further revealed that the pyrite was severely eroded by A. ferrooxidans and some spheroidal particles covered the surfaces of pyrite residues. These particles are most likely to be KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 based on EDS analysis. The present study has quantitatively confirmed the presence of intermediate products of S0 and SnO62− during pyrite oxidation, information that deepens our understanding of the mechanism of pyrite oxidation. •HPLC is an efficient technique to detect the S0 and SnO62−.•S0 is formed definitely during pyrite oxidation process.•Some species of SnO62− also formed and their concentrations increased.•ferrooxidans promoted the pyrite oxidation.•ferrooxidans accelerated KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6) and FeOOH formation.
ISSN:0304-386X
1879-1158
DOI:10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.11.001