Regulation of AI algorithms for clinical decision support: a personal opinion

Meticulous provenance of data [3], from whom, where [including imaging infrastructure and protocols], and when data were collected, along with documentation of population diversity [gender, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, appropriate age distribution] within geographic areas should be non-negotiable....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal for computer assisted radiology and surgery Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 609 - 611
Main Author Kandarpa, Kris
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.04.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1861-6429
1861-6410
1861-6429
DOI10.1007/s11548-024-03088-0

Cover

More Information
Summary:Meticulous provenance of data [3], from whom, where [including imaging infrastructure and protocols], and when data were collected, along with documentation of population diversity [gender, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, appropriate age distribution] within geographic areas should be non-negotiable. ‘Time-stamped’ datasets, being important for monitoring temporal drifts in the contained data [e.g., due to changes in disease prevalence, population migration, technology or standards of clinical care], would provide auditable trails to enable version control and replicability, while enhancing the generalizability of an algorithm. A concrete method developers may use during deployment is to provide data source ‘nutrition labels’ [like content labels on packaged food] specifying the geographic diversity, representation [gender, age, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, etc.] and collection periods of data used for training and validation [5]. [...]regulators may require developers to reveal the characteristics and limitations of the data source and declare optimal ‘conditions’ under which the submitted CDSA should be employed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:1861-6429
1861-6410
1861-6429
DOI:10.1007/s11548-024-03088-0