Reducing Political Dehumanization by Pairing Facts With Personal Experiences
The media is increasingly blamed for inflaming political animosity, but it may also bridge partisan divides—with the right strategies. Past research highlights the outgroup‐experience effect : Sharing personal experiences (and not facts) helps to reduce partisan animosity. However, sharing facts is...
Saved in:
Published in | Political psychology Vol. 44; no. 5; pp. 1119 - 1140 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.10.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0162-895X 1467-9221 |
DOI | 10.1111/pops.12875 |
Cover
Summary: | The media is increasingly blamed for inflaming political animosity, but it may also bridge partisan divides—with the right strategies. Past research highlights the
outgroup‐experience effect
: Sharing personal experiences (and not facts) helps to reduce partisan animosity. However, sharing facts is a pillar of good journalism and is essential for mediated political communication. Across four studies in two countries, we show that journalists, and citizens on social media sites, can share facts about contentious political issues (gun and climate policy), while simultaneously increasing tolerance and reducing dehumanization of political opponents. We extend the
outgroup‐experience effect
by introducing factual content alongside personal experiences of political adversaries (i.e., a combination approach). These effects are replicated in both the United States and Germany although in Germany the personal experience intervention is only beneficial for people with more extreme attitudes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0162-895X 1467-9221 |
DOI: | 10.1111/pops.12875 |