State-Specific and Supraordinal Components of Facial Response to Pain

• Published in: IEEE transactions on affective computing Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 793 - 804
• Main Authors: Dirupo, Giada, Garlasco, Paolo, Chappuis, Cyrielle, Sharvit, Gil, Corradi-DellaAcqua, Corrado
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Piscataway IEEE 01.04.2022; The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
• Subjects: Algorithms; Diagnosis or assessment; emotion in human-computer interaction; Face; Gold; health care; Machine learning; nonverbal signals; Olfactory; Pain; Stimuli; synthesis of affective behavior; Temperature measurement
• ISSN: 1949-3045; 1949-3045
• DOI: 10.1109/TAFFC.2020.2965105

Pain inadequate treatment is frequent in modern society, with major medical, ethical, and financial implications. In many healthcare environments, pain is quantified prevalently through subjective measures, such as self-reports from patients or health care providers' personal experience. Recently, automatic diagnostic tools have been developed to detect and quantify pain more "objectively" from facial expressions. However, it is still unclear if these approaches can distinguish pain from other aversive (but painless) states. In this article, we analyzed the facial responses from a database of video-recorded facial reactions evoked by comparably-unpleasant painful and disgusting stimuli. We modeled this information as function of subjective unpleasantness, as well as the specific state evoked by the stimuli (pain vs . disgust). Results show that a machine learning algorithm could predict subjective pain unpleasantness from facial information, but mistakenly detected unpleasant disgust, especially in those models relying in great extent on the brow lowerer. Importantly, pain and disgust could be disentangled using an ad hoc algorithm that rely on combined information from the eyes and the mouth. Overall, the facial expression of pain contains both specific and unpleasantness-related information shared with disgust. Automatic diagnostic tools should be guided to account for this confounding effect.