Clinical Accuracy of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System With an Advanced Algorithm

• Published in: Journal of diabetes science and technology Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 209 - 214
• Main Authors: Bailey, Timothy S., Chang, Anna, Christiansen, Mark
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.03.2015
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Blood Glucose - analysis; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation; Diabetes Mellitus - blood; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Original; Young Adult; continuous glucose monitoring; advanced algorithm; clinical accuracy
• ISSN: 1932-2968; 1932-3107
• DOI: 10.1177/1932296814559746

Background: We assessed the performance of a modified Dexcom G4 Platinum system with an advanced algorithm, in comparison with frequent venous samples measured on a laboratory reference (YSI) during a clinic session and in comparison to self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) during home use. Methods: Fifty-one subjects with diabetes were enrolled in a prospective multicenter study. Subjects wore 1 sensor for 7-day use and participated in one 12-hour in-clinic session on day 1, 4, or 7 to collect YSI reference venous glucose every 15 minutes and capillary SMBG test every 30 minutes. Carbohydrate consumption and insulin dosing and timing were manipulated to obtain data in low and high glucose ranges. Results: In comparison with the laboratory reference method (n = 2,263) the system provided a mean and median absolute relative differences (ARD) of 9.0% and 7.0%, respectively. The mean absolute difference for CGM was 6.4 mg/dL when the YSIs were within hypoglycemia ranges (≤ 70 mg/dL). The percentage in the clinically accurate Clarke error grid A zone was 92.4% and in the benign error B zone was 7.1%. Majority of the sensors (73%) had an aggregated MARD in reference to YSI ≤ 10%. The MARD of CGM-SMBG for home use was 11.3%. Conclusions: The study showed that the point and rate accuracy, clinical accuracy, reliability, and consistency over the duration of wear and across glycemic ranges were superior to current commercial real-time CGM systems. The performance of this CGM is reaching that of a self-monitoring blood glucose meter in real use environment.