Education level and risk of breast cancer by tumor subtype in the EPIC cohort

• Published in: International journal of cancer Vol. 157; no. 4; pp. 672 - 686
• Main Authors: Pizzato, Margherita, McCormack, Valerie, Dossus, Laure, Al‐Alem, Umaima, Delpierre, Cyrille, Lamy, Sebastien, Macciotta, Alessandra, Ricceri, Fulvio, Mellemkjær, Lene, Tjønneland, Anne, Dahm, Christina C., Antoniussen, Christian S., Guénel, Pascal, Fournier, Agnès, Frenoy, Pauline, Schulze, Matthias B., Kaaks, Rudolf, Fortner, Renée Turzanski, Ferrari, Pietro, Pala, Valeria, Panico, Salvatore, Tumino, Rosario, Masala, Giovanna, Olsen, Karina Standahl, Gram, Inger Torhild, Braaten, Tonje, Castro‐Espin, Carlota, Etxezarreta, Pilar Amiano, Atxega, Amaia, Huerta, José María, Sánchez, Maria‐José, Guevara, Marcela, Gathani, Toral, Rinaldi, Sabina, Vineis, Paolo, Vaccarella, Salvatore
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 15.08.2025; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Biochemistry, Molecular Biology; Breast cancer; breast cancer risk; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; Cohort Studies; Education; education level; Educational Status; ErbB-2 protein; estrogen receptor; Estrogen receptors; Female; Humans; Incidence; Invasiveness; Life Sciences; Middle Aged; molecular subtypes; Progesterone; Prognosis; Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism; Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism; Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism; Regression analysis; Risk Factors; molecular subtypes; education level; breast cancer risk; estrogen receptor
• ISSN: 0020-7136; 1097-0215; 1097-0215
• DOI: 10.1002/ijc.35413

Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with subtypes based on receptor status (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]), influencing prognosis and treatment. A higher socioeconomic position (SEP) is associated with an increased BC risk, but its relation to BC subtypes is less clear. This study analyzed 311,631 women from the EPIC cohort, focusing on the incidence of in situ and invasive BC (overall and by receptor status and subtype). Educational attainment was used as a proxy for SEP, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox regression models. Mediation analyses were performed to evaluate the extent to which selected risk factors explained the educational gradient. Over 14 years, 14,432 BC cases were identified, including 12,863 invasive cases. Lower education was associated with a reduced risk of both in situ and invasive BCs. The HRs for primary versus tertiary education were 0.61 (95% CI 0.49–0.73) for in situ and 0.81 (95% CI 0.75–0.87) for invasive BC overall, with similar reductions across ER‐positive, PR‐positive, HER2‐positive, Luminal A, BH−, and BH+. No significant association was found between education and ER‐negative, and HER2‐enriched BCs. Reproductive and lifestyle factors explained 20–40% of the educational differences in BC risk. While many of the risk factors through which education impacts the development of subtype‐specific BC were identified, others remain to be fully elucidated. Differences in screening attendance could partially explain the higher ER‐positive BC risk among highly educated; this study further contributes to the understanding of the complex nature of BC in terms of its social gradient and aetiology. What's new? This study explores the link between education level and breast cancer risk, focusing on different breast cancer subtypes. Analyzing data from over 311,000 women in the EPIC cohort, it found that lower educational levels were linked to a reduced risk of breast cancer, particularly for subtypes with a better prognosis. Known risk factors only partly explained these educational differences, underscoring the complex interplay of social and biological factors in breast cancer risk.