Risk assessment methodology for trajectory planning in keyhole neurosurgery using genetic algorithms

Background: Preoperative assessment to find the safest trajectory in keyhole neurosurgery can reduce post operative complications. Methods: We introduced a novel preoperative risk assessment semiautomated methodology based on the sum of N maximum risk values using a generic genetic algorithm for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. e2060 - n/a
Main Authors Villanueva‐Naquid, Iván, Soubervielle‐Montalvo, Carlos, Aguilar‐Ponce, Ruth M., Tovar‐Arriaga, Saúl, Cuevas‐Tello, Juan C., Puente‐Montejano, Cesar A., Mejia‐Carlos, Marcela, Torres‐Corzo, Jaime G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1478-5951
1478-596X
1478-596X
DOI10.1002/rcs.2060

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background: Preoperative assessment to find the safest trajectory in keyhole neurosurgery can reduce post operative complications. Methods: We introduced a novel preoperative risk assessment semiautomated methodology based on the sum of N maximum risk values using a generic genetic algorithm for the safest trajectory search. Results: A set of candidates trajectories were found for two surgical procedures. The trajectories search is done using a risk map considering the proximity of voxels within risk structures in multiple points and a genetic algorithm to avoid an exhaustive search. The trajectories were validated by a group of neurosurgeons. Conclusions: The trajectories obtained with the proposal method were shorter in 5% and have greater distance from the voxels within the blood vessels in 4.7%. The use of genetic algorithm (GA) speeds up the search for the safest trajectory, decreasing in 99.9% the time required for an exhaustive search.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1478-5951
1478-596X
1478-596X
DOI:10.1002/rcs.2060