Deep Statistical Comparison for Multi-Objective Stochastic Optimization Algorithms
Making a statistical comparison of meta-heuristic multi-objective optimization algorithms is crucial for identifying the strengths and weaknesses of a newly proposed algorithm. Currently, state-of-the-art comparison approaches involve user-preference-based selection of a single quality indicator or...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Swarm and evolutionary computation Vol. 61; p. 100837 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
            Elsevier B.V
    
        01.03.2021
     | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 2210-6502 2210-6510  | 
| DOI | 10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100837 | 
Cover
| Summary: | Making a statistical comparison of meta-heuristic multi-objective optimization algorithms is crucial for identifying the strengths and weaknesses of a newly proposed algorithm. Currently, state-of-the-art comparison approaches involve user-preference-based selection of a single quality indicator or an ensemble of quality indicators as a comparison metric. Using these quality indicators, high-dimensional data is transformed into one-dimensional data. By doing this, information contained in the high-dimensional space can be lost, which will affect the results of the comparison. To avoid losing this information, we propose a novel ranking scheme that compares the distributions of high-dimensional data. Experimental results show that the proposed approach reduces potential information loss when statistical significance is not observed in high-dimensional data. Consequently, the selection of a quality indicator is required only in cases when statistical significance is observed in high-dimensional data. With this the cases that are affected by the user preference selection are reduced. | 
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2210-6502 2210-6510  | 
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100837 |