A Quick Pessimistic Diagnosis Algorithm for Hypercube-Like Multiprocessor Systems under the PMC Model

Processor fault diagnosis is an essential subject for the reliability of a multiprocessor system. The precise strategy and the pessimistic strategy are two classical diagnostic strategies which are based on the well-known PMC model. The precise strategy problem of fault diagnosis is discussed widely...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on computers Vol. 62; no. 2; pp. 259 - 267
Main Author Tsai, Chang-Hsiung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.02.2013
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0018-9340
1557-9956
DOI10.1109/TC.2011.228

Cover

More Information
Summary:Processor fault diagnosis is an essential subject for the reliability of a multiprocessor system. The precise strategy and the pessimistic strategy are two classical diagnostic strategies which are based on the well-known PMC model. The precise strategy problem of fault diagnosis is discussed widely and demands that all processors be identified correctly, specifically that all fault-free processors are identified as "fault free" and all faulty processors are identified as "faulty." The pessimistic diagnosis strategy is a process to diagnose faults that allows all faulty processors to be isolated within a set that contains at most one fault-free processor. In this paper, we study the pessimistic diagnosis strategy under the PMC model for hypercube-like multiprocessor systems. The contribution is to propose an efficient pessimistic diagnosis algorithm for hypercube-like multiprocessor systems. If we denote by N the total number of processors in the hypercube-like system to be diagnosed, the algorithm can run in O(N) time.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0018-9340
1557-9956
DOI:10.1109/TC.2011.228