Performance evaluation of building integrated photovoltaic system arrays (SP, TT, QT, and TCT) to improve maximum power with low mismatch loss under partial shading

• Published in: Microsystem technologies : sensors, actuators, systems integration Vol. 30; no. 5; pp. 583 - 597
• Main Authors: Bhattacharya, Sagnik, Sadhu, Pradip Kumar, Sarkar, Debayan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.05.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Air conditioning; Algorithms; Arrays; Building envelopes; Buildings; Configuration management; Design; Efficiency; Electric power demand; Electricity; Electronics and Microelectronics; Emissions; Energy consumption; Engineering; Instrumentation; Maximum power; Mechanical Engineering; Mismatch (electrical); Nanotechnology; Payback periods; Performance enhancement; Performance evaluation; Photovoltaic cells; Roofing; Shades; Shading; Technical Paper; Urban environments; Windows (computer programs); Wiring; India
• ISSN: 0946-7076; 1432-1858
• DOI: 10.1007/s00542-023-05564-0

Global electricity demand is increasing with the rising population and rapid urbanization. Building Integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) system is a new method of renewable energy generation where solar photovoltaic (PV) modules are integrated into the building surfaces such as façade, shades, windows, roofs, and tiles. BIPV systems reduce the urban energy demand. Utilization of vertical surfaces makes the BIPV system a preferable choice where land scarcity affects the implementation of large PV systems. The economic viability depends on the maximum power generated by the BIPV array. In urban environments, the BIPV arrays experience severe partial shading conditions (PSCs). The PSCs cause mismatch losses, reducing the global maximum power of the BIPV array and efficiency. Fixed array configurations such as series-parallel (SP), total-cross-tied (TCT), triple-tied (TT), and quarter-tied (QT) are designed to solve this issue. The cross ties across the rows of the BIPV array improve the performance at the expense of more wiring. Researchers proposed various optimal array configurations with different shading patterns. This research attempts to generalize the design of the BIPV array configurations by considering the trade-off between wiring requirements and shading losses. The performance of SP, TT, QT, and TCT configurations under four different shading conditions is simulated with the proposed BIPV array design algorithm. A 9 × 8 BIPV array of 3.6 kW is considered. QT configuration reduces the wiring requirement by 10.45% compared to TCT and improves up to 8.43% maximum power than SP. The fill factor is improved to 48.49%, and the mismatch loss is limited to 34.10%. Therefore, QT and TCT are considered favorable configurations for BIPV array design.