Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Is Associated With Worse Arterial and Saphenous Vein Graft Patency and Less Effective Revascularization Results From the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Trial

The Department of Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial compared clinical and angiographic outcomes in off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery to ascertain the relative efficacy of the 2 techniques. From February 2002 to May 2007, the ROOBY trial randomi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 125; no. 23; pp. 2827 - 2835
Main Authors Hattler, Brack, Messenger, John C., Shroyer, A. Laurie, Collins, Joseph F., Haugen, Scott J., Garcia, Joel A., Baltz, Janet H., Cleveland, Joseph C., Novitzky, Dimitri, Grover, Frederick L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hagerstown, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 12.06.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0009-7322
1524-4539
1524-4539
DOI10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.069260

Cover

More Information
Summary:The Department of Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial compared clinical and angiographic outcomes in off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery to ascertain the relative efficacy of the 2 techniques. From February 2002 to May 2007, the ROOBY trial randomized 2203 patients to off-pump versus on-pump CABG. Follow-up angiography was obtained in 685 off-pump (62%) and 685 on-pump (62%) patients. Angiograms were analyzed (blinded to treatment) for FitzGibbon classification (A=widely patent, B=flow limited, O=occluded) and effective revascularization. Effective revascularization was defined as follows: All 3 major coronary territories with significant disease were revascularized by a FitzGibbon A-quality graft to the major diseased artery, and there were no new postanastomotic lesions. Off-pump CABG resulted in lower FitzGibbon A patency rates than on-pump CABG for arterial conduits (85.8% versus 91.4%; P=0.003) and saphenous vein grafts (72.7% versus 80.4%; P<0.001). Fewer off-pump patients were effectively revascularized (50.1% versus 63.9% on-pump; P<0.001). Within each major coronary territory, effective revascularization was worse off pump than on pump (all P≤0.001). The 1-year adverse cardiac event rate was 16.4% in patients with ineffective revascularization versus 5.9% in patients with effective revascularization (P<0.001). Off-pump CABG resulted in significantly lower FitzGibbon A patency for arterial and saphenous vein graft conduits and less effective revascularization than on-pump CABG. At 1 year, patients with less effective revascularization had higher adverse event rates. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00032630.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.069260