Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using IOLMaster and Various Formulas in Short Eyes

To evaluate the predictability of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the IOLMaster and four different IOL power calculation formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, SRK II, and SRK/T) for cataract surgery in eyes with a short axial length (AL). The present study was a retrospective comparative analy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKorean journal of ophthalmology Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 151 - 155
Main Authors Roh, Young Rae, Lee, Sang Mok, Han, Young Keun, Kim, Mee Kum, Wee, Won Ryang, Lee, Jin Hak
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Ophthalmological Society 01.06.2011
대한안과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1011-8942
2092-9382
2092-9382
DOI10.3341/kjo.2011.25.3.151

Cover

More Information
Summary:To evaluate the predictability of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the IOLMaster and four different IOL power calculation formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, SRK II, and SRK/T) for cataract surgery in eyes with a short axial length (AL). The present study was a retrospective comparative analysis which included 25 eyes with an AL shorter than 22.0 mm that underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with IOL implantation from July 2007 to December 2008 at Seoul National University Boramae Hospital. Preoperative AL and keratometric power were measured by the IOLMaster, and power of the implanted IOL was determined using Haigis, Hoffer Q, SRK II, and SRK/T formulas. Postoperative refractive errors two months after surgery were measured using automatic refracto-keratometry (Nidek) and were compared with the predicted postoperative power. The mean absolute error (MAE) was defined as the average of the absolute value of the difference between actual and predicted spherical equivalences of postoperative refractive error. The MAE was smallest with the Haigis formula (0.37 ± 0.26 diopter [D]), followed by those of SRK/T (0.53 ± 0.25 D), SRK II (0.56 ± 0.20 D), and Hoffer Q (0.62 ± 0.16 D) in 25 eyes with an AL shorter than 22.0 mm. The proportion with an absolute error (AE) of less than 1 D was greatest in the Haigis formula (96%), followed by those in the SRK II (88%), SRK-T (84%), and Hoffer Q (80%). The MAE was less than 0.7 D and the proportion of AE less than 1 D was more than 80% in all formulas. The IOL power calculation using the Haigis formula showed the best results for postoperative power prediction in short eyes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
G704-002170.2011.25.3.010
ISSN:1011-8942
2092-9382
2092-9382
DOI:10.3341/kjo.2011.25.3.151