Metabolic fractures: How household livelihood practices differentiate agricultural input use in southwest China

As smallholders in the global South engage in new ways with agricultural markets, they change their farming strategies and use of agricultural inputs. In many locales, heavy use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides gives state authorities figurative headaches and farmers actual health hazards and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of rural studies Vol. 71; pp. 1 - 12
Main Authors Zinda, John Aloysius, Kapoor, Shrey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0743-0167
1873-1392
DOI10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.008

Cover

More Information
Summary:As smallholders in the global South engage in new ways with agricultural markets, they change their farming strategies and use of agricultural inputs. In many locales, heavy use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides gives state authorities figurative headaches and farmers actual health hazards and soil degradation. It has been argued that agricultural commercialization and urbanization generate metabolic rifts—gaps in nutrient cycling that impoverish soils and accumulate wastes. Replacement of organic with synthetic inputs is central to this dynamic. We join metabolic rift theory with livelihood analysis to examine how varying livelihood strategies differentiate input use in an area of southwest China where farming is partially commercialized. We draw on household survey data to identify five household clusters with distinct on-farm activity patterns. Regression analyses show that these farming strategies mediate effects of household and community attributes on use of synthetic fertilizers, synthetic pesticides, and organic manure fertilizer. Strategies associated with diverse on-farm crop rotations are associated with greater use of manure. Emergent tree-borne crops are associated with greater pesticide use, but new high-elevation cash crops are linked to less use of both synthetic and organic inputs. These variations have gendered impacts: women's work around compost fertilizer gives way to male-dominated synthetic input management. Our theoretical synthesis and empirical results enrich both livelihoods and metabolic rift scholarship by showing how livelihood strategies mediate political economic forces, generating heterogeneous input use. This study demonstrates the uneven processes through which metabolic rifts tear open and the necessity for soil enhancement efforts to address farmers' variegated practices. •We join metabolic rift theory with livelihood analysis to examine varying household use of synthetic and organic inputs.•Farming strategies mediate effects of household and community attributes input use.•Tree crops are associated with more pesticide use, but other cash crops with less of both synthetic and organic inputs.•Impacts are gendered: women's work around compost fertilizer gives way to male-dominated synthetic input management.•Livelihood strategies mediate political economic forces, bringing heterogeneous input use.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0743-0167
1873-1392
DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.008