Effective parameter range for equivalence of velocity-level and acceleration-level redundancy resolution schemes

This Letter shows the equivalence of the velocity-level and acceleration-level redundancy resolution schemes by using so-called Zhang et al.ʼs neural-dynamic method. In addition, the equivalence requires that a design parameter be sufficiently large. But how large should it be? The effective range o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysics letters. A Vol. 376; no. 21; pp. 1736 - 1739
Main Authors Zhang, Yunong, Wu, Huarong, Guo, Dongsheng, Xiao, Lin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 23.04.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0375-9601
1873-2429
DOI10.1016/j.physleta.2012.04.008

Cover

More Information
Summary:This Letter shows the equivalence of the velocity-level and acceleration-level redundancy resolution schemes by using so-called Zhang et al.ʼs neural-dynamic method. In addition, the equivalence requires that a design parameter be sufficiently large. But how large should it be? The effective range of such a design parameter is thus determined by means of the 2%-difference rule and the runtime of the computer-simulations. ► Equivalence of the two classes of redundancy resolution schemes is further proved. ► This Letter finds that the equivalence is closely related to a design parameter. ► Effective range for the design parameter is determined for the first time.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0375-9601
1873-2429
DOI:10.1016/j.physleta.2012.04.008