Effective parameter range for equivalence of velocity-level and acceleration-level redundancy resolution schemes
This Letter shows the equivalence of the velocity-level and acceleration-level redundancy resolution schemes by using so-called Zhang et al.ʼs neural-dynamic method. In addition, the equivalence requires that a design parameter be sufficiently large. But how large should it be? The effective range o...
Saved in:
| Published in | Physics letters. A Vol. 376; no. 21; pp. 1736 - 1739 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Elsevier B.V
23.04.2012
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0375-9601 1873-2429 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.physleta.2012.04.008 |
Cover
| Summary: | This Letter shows the equivalence of the velocity-level and acceleration-level redundancy resolution schemes by using so-called Zhang et al.ʼs neural-dynamic method. In addition, the equivalence requires that a design parameter be sufficiently large. But how large should it be? The effective range of such a design parameter is thus determined by means of the 2%-difference rule and the runtime of the computer-simulations.
► Equivalence of the two classes of redundancy resolution schemes is further proved. ► This Letter finds that the equivalence is closely related to a design parameter. ► Effective range for the design parameter is determined for the first time. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0375-9601 1873-2429 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.physleta.2012.04.008 |