Effect of netupitant, a highly selective NK1 receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of palonosetron and impact of the fixed dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron when coadministered with ketoconazole, rifampicin, and oral contraceptives

Objectives Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK 1 RAs) are commonly coadministered with a 5-HT 3 RA such as palonosetron to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy. Netupitant, a new highly selective NK 1 RA, is both a substrate for and a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4. Three studies were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSupportive care in cancer Vol. 21; no. 10; pp. 2879 - 2887
Main Authors Calcagnile, Selma, Lanzarotti, Corinna, Rossi, Giorgia, Henriksson, Anders, Kammerer, Klaus Peter, Timmer, Wolfgang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.10.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0941-4355
1433-7339
1433-7339
DOI10.1007/s00520-013-1857-9

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objectives Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK 1 RAs) are commonly coadministered with a 5-HT 3 RA such as palonosetron to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy. Netupitant, a new highly selective NK 1 RA, is both a substrate for and a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4. Three studies were designed to evaluate the potential drug–drug interaction of netupitant with palonosetron and of the fixed dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron, NEPA, with an inhibitor (ketoconazole), an inducer (rifampicin) and a substrate (oral contraceptives) of CYP3A4. Methods Study 1 was a three-way crossover in 18 healthy subjects receiving netupitant alone, palonosetron alone, and the combination of both antiemetics. Studies 2 and 3 were two-way crossover trials where healthy subjects received NEPA (the fixed dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron). In study 2, 36 subjects received NEPA alone (day 1) and in combination with ketoconazole or rifampicin. In study 3, 24 healthy women received ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel alone or in combination with NEPA (day 1). Results There were no significant pharmacokinetic interactions between netupitant and palonosetron. Ketoconazole increased netupitant area under curve (AUC) by 140 % and C max by 25 %. Rifampicin decreased netupitant AUC by 83 % and C max by 62 %. NEPA did not significantly affect exposure to ethinylestradiol, while systemic exposure to levonorgestrel increased by 40 %, but this was not considered clinically relevant. Conclusions There were no clinically relevant interactions between netupitant and palonosetron, or between NEPA and oral contraceptives. The coadministration of NEPA with inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 may require dose adjustments. Treatments were well tolerated.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-013-1857-9