A GEOMETRICAL APERTURE–WIDTH RELATIONSHIP FOR ROCK FRACTURES

The relationship between fracture aperture (maximum opening; d max ) and fracture width ( w ) has been the subject of debate over the past several decades. An empirical power law has been commonly applied to relate these two parameters. Its exponent ( n ) is generally determined by fitting the power...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFractals (Singapore) Vol. 27; no. 1; p. 1940002
Main Authors GHANBARIAN, BEHZAD, PERFECT, EDMUND, LIU, HUI-HAI
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore World Scientific Publishing Company 01.02.2019
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0218-348X
1793-6543
DOI10.1142/S0218348X19400024

Cover

More Information
Summary:The relationship between fracture aperture (maximum opening; d max ) and fracture width ( w ) has been the subject of debate over the past several decades. An empirical power law has been commonly applied to relate these two parameters. Its exponent ( n ) is generally determined by fitting the power-law function to experimental observations measured at various scales. Invoking concepts from fractal geometry we theoretically show, as a first-order approximation, that the fracture aperture should be a linear function of its width, meaning that n = 1 . This finding is in agreement with the result of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) theory. We compare the model predictions with experimental observations available in the literature. This comparison generally supports a linear relationship between fracture aperture and fracture width, although there exists considerable scatter in the data. We also discuss the limitations of the proposed model, and its potential application to the prediction of flow and transport in fractures. Based on more than 170 experimental observations from the literature, we show that such a linear relationship, in combination with the cubic law, is able to scale flow rate with fracture aperture over ∼ 14 orders of magnitude for variations in flow rate and ∼ 5 orders of magnitude for variations in fracture width.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0218-348X
1793-6543
DOI:10.1142/S0218348X19400024