Three-dimensional Analysis of Maxillary Morphology in Infants with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

• Published in: The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal Vol. 62; no. 5; p. 835
• Main Authors: Zheng, Jie, Kuang, Wenying, Yuan, Shiyu, He, Hong, Yuan, Wenjun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.2025
• Subjects: Cleft Lip - diagnostic imaging; Cleft Lip - pathology; Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging; Cleft Palate - pathology; Female; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Maxilla - abnormalities; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging; Maxilla - pathology; Principal Component Analysis; infant orthopedics; development; nonsyndromic clefting; cleft lip and palate; skeletal morphology; maxilla
• ISSN: 1545-1569
• DOI: 10.1177/10556656241228903

ObjectiveTo three-dimensionally (3D) analyze the maxillary morphology of infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and preliminarily classify the alveolar arch to assist in personalization of sequence therapy.DesignRetrospective study.SettingPatients with UCLP referred to outpatients' clinic.Participants84 nonsyndromic infants with complete UCLP were recruited (58 boys, 26 girls, mean age 29.48 days).Main Outcome MeasureMorphometric analysis was conducted on 3D maxillary models. Principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis were combined to classify maxillary phenotypes preliminarily. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare differences between variables. A value less than .05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsThe maxilla was divided into three types: narrow, homogenous and broad, accounting for 9.52%, 23.81% and 66.67% respectively. The alveolar cleft site (median value) was located in 61% of the total length of the alveolar arch. In the comparison of anterior and total alveolar lengths, the non-cleft side had longer alveolar bone than the affected side, a difference of approximately 2 mm. Pairwise comparisons of variables describing alveolar symmetry revealed significant differences in all subjects; whereas type C had poorer arch symmetry than types A and B, mainly in terms of anterior and overall symmetry.ConclusionsIn infants with UCLP, the maxillary alveolar arch was inherently asymmetrical with partially bone missing (about 2 mm). Significant differences in alveolar bone morphology and symmetry exist between different types of infants, with individuals with broad clefts (type C, the largest proportion) having the worst maxillary development.