Comparison between two model-based algorithms for Li-ion battery SOC estimation in electric vehicles

► A nonlinear battery model is identified for Li-ion battery state estimation. ► Two SOC-estimation filters using the established model are compared. ► The novel robust filter has a smaller error bound than does the standard filter. ► The novel robust filter has a better robustness against system no...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSimulation modelling practice and theory Vol. 34; pp. 1 - 11
Main Authors Hu, Xiaosong, Sun, Fengchun, Zou, Yuan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.05.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1569-190X
1878-1462
DOI10.1016/j.simpat.2013.01.001

Cover

More Information
Summary:► A nonlinear battery model is identified for Li-ion battery state estimation. ► Two SOC-estimation filters using the established model are compared. ► The novel robust filter has a smaller error bound than does the standard filter. ► The novel robust filter has a better robustness against system noise statistics. Accurate battery State of Charge (SOC) estimation is of great significance for safe and efficient energy utilization for electric vehicles. This paper presents a comparison between a novel robust extended Kalman filter (REKF) and a standard extended Kalman filter (EKF) for Li-ion battery SOC indication. The REKF-based method is formulated to explicitly compensate for the battery modeling uncertainty and linearization error often involved in EKF, as well as to provide robustness against the battery system noise to some extent. Evaluation results indicate that both filters have a good average performance, given appropriate noise covariances, owing to a small average modeling error. However, in contrast, the REKF-based SOC estimation method possesses slightly smaller root-mean-square (RMS) error. In the worst case, the robustness characteristics of the REKF result in an obviously smaller error bound (around by 1%). Additionally, the REKF-based approach shows superior robustness against the noise statistics, leading to a better tolerance to inappropriate tuning of the process and measurement noise covariances.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1569-190X
1878-1462
DOI:10.1016/j.simpat.2013.01.001