Approximate Latent Factor Algorithm for Scenario Selection and Weighting in Transmission Expansion Planning

One major difficulty in transmission expansion planning is selecting the representative scenarios to use to evaluate candidate transmission networks. The variability in demand and renewable generation makes the inclusion of several scenarios critical when calculating reliability and cost, but includ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on power systems Vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 1099 - 1108
Main Authors Bukenberger, Jesse P., Webster, Mort D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.03.2020
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0885-8950
1558-0679
1558-0679
DOI10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2942925

Cover

More Information
Summary:One major difficulty in transmission expansion planning is selecting the representative scenarios to use to evaluate candidate transmission networks. The variability in demand and renewable generation makes the inclusion of several scenarios critical when calculating reliability and cost, but including too many scenarios in an optimization is computationally intractable. To reduce the number of representative operating conditions needed to obtain an accurate approximation of the system, we propose a method rooted in multivariate statistics that exploits the latent correlative structure between different scenarios and network configurations. The proposed algorithm includes an objective and rigorous way to select a subset of scenarios that provide as much information about the system as possible, and a method to accurately approximate the system cost from that scenario subset. The result is a set of scenarios and weights that are easily incorporated into traditional transmission expansion planning formulations. We apply this to a 312-bus WECC model with 8,736 distinct operating conditions. The transmission plans found with the proposed method are more reliable and have a lower total cost than those from other scenario reduction techniques, as well as a smaller error between the expected system performance from the optimization objective and the actual system performance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0885-8950
1558-0679
1558-0679
DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2942925