Benchmarked simulations of natural convection airflow in a square cavity
An open-source code, OpenFOAM, and two commercial finite volume packages are benchmarked for accuracy and convergence speed in solving steady natural convection airflows in a square cavity with adiabatic horizontal boundaries and with high temperature difference on the two vertical side walls. The c...
Saved in:
| Published in | Numerical heat transfer. Part A, Applications Vol. 84; no. 3; pp. 252 - 268 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Philadelphia
Taylor & Francis
03.08.2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1040-7782 1521-0634 |
| DOI | 10.1080/10407782.2022.2105120 |
Cover
| Summary: | An open-source code, OpenFOAM, and two commercial finite volume packages are benchmarked for accuracy and convergence speed in solving steady natural convection airflows in a square cavity with adiabatic horizontal boundaries and with high temperature difference on the two vertical side walls. The compressible two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations are solved at Rayleigh numbers 10
6
and 10
7
(steady flow for Rayleigh numbers less than 2 × 10
8
) using seven different CFD algorithms, including both transient and steady flow solvers. Velocity fields, pressures, temperatures and Nusselt numbers are compared against well-established results for three benchmark test cases from the literature. Relative accuracy and CPU time are reported for each algorithm and for each of the three test cases, yielding benchmarked comparisons of OpenFOAM, STAR-CCM+, and ANSYS-Fluent solvers for low Mach number compressible airflows. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 1040-7782 1521-0634 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/10407782.2022.2105120 |