Familiarity Breeds Trust? The Relationship between Dating App Use and Trust in Dating Algorithms via Algorithm Awareness and Critical Algorithm Perceptions

Previous studies have suggested that dating app use can foster acceptance of the controversial idea of algorithm matchmaking. However, an integrated framework to explain this relationship is lacking. To address this gap, this study proposes a familiarity-breeds-trust hypothesis, which suggests that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of human-computer interaction Vol. 40; no. 17; pp. 4596 - 4607
Main Authors Hu, Junwen, Wang, Rui
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Norwood Taylor & Francis 01.09.2024
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1044-7318
1532-7590
1044-7318
DOI10.1080/10447318.2023.2217014

Cover

More Information
Summary:Previous studies have suggested that dating app use can foster acceptance of the controversial idea of algorithm matchmaking. However, an integrated framework to explain this relationship is lacking. To address this gap, this study proposes a familiarity-breeds-trust hypothesis, which suggests that dating app use can increase trust in dating algorithms by raising algorithm awareness and enhancing perceived agency. To test this hypothesis, the current work employed an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. Study 1 interviewed 19 dating app users and identified four types of critical algorithm perceptions that reflected perceived threats to user agency. Study 2 surveyed 371 users of Tantan-a mainstream Chinese dating app that resembles Tinder-and found a positive relationship between Tantan use and trust in dating algorithms. Additionally, Tantan use was positively related to algorithm awareness, which was negatively related to critical algorithm perceptions. Furthermore, critical algorithm perceptions negatively predicted trust in dating algorithms. The findings provide support for the familiarity-breeds-trust hypothesis. Theoretical implications for future human-algorithm interaction studies and practical suggestions are also discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1044-7318
1532-7590
1044-7318
DOI:10.1080/10447318.2023.2217014