Reducing political polarization through narrative writing
This study proposes two complementary writing activities designed to reduce affective polarization and malevolent outgroup attributions. The strategies draw on narrative theorizing and intergroup contact theory. Our intervention is low cost and can be effectively administrated in educational setting...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of Applied Communication Research Vol. 48; no. 4; pp. 459 - 477 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Annandale
Routledge
03.07.2020
National Communication Association |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0090-9882 1479-5752 |
DOI | 10.1080/00909882.2020.1789195 |
Cover
Summary: | This study proposes two complementary writing activities designed to reduce affective polarization and malevolent outgroup attributions. The strategies draw on narrative theorizing and intergroup contact theory. Our intervention is low cost and can be effectively administrated in educational settings to combat the deleterious effects of political polarization. In this four-group between-subjects randomized experiment (n = 179), we found that a first-person perspective taking narrative writing exercise and a common ingroup cooperative narrative writing exercise both reduced political polarization and, thereby, reduced malevolent outgroup attributions. Our results revealed that both activities improved affect toward and perceived similarity with a noxious member of the political outgroup and, as a result, reduced affective political polarization. We discuss the theoretical and applied implications of our findings and encourage educators to adopt activities modeled after our interventions in their classrooms. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0090-9882 1479-5752 |
DOI: | 10.1080/00909882.2020.1789195 |