Reducing political polarization through narrative writing

This study proposes two complementary writing activities designed to reduce affective polarization and malevolent outgroup attributions. The strategies draw on narrative theorizing and intergroup contact theory. Our intervention is low cost and can be effectively administrated in educational setting...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Applied Communication Research Vol. 48; no. 4; pp. 459 - 477
Main Authors Warner, Benjamin R., Horstman, Haley Kranstuber, Kearney, Cassandra C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Annandale Routledge 03.07.2020
National Communication Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0090-9882
1479-5752
DOI10.1080/00909882.2020.1789195

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study proposes two complementary writing activities designed to reduce affective polarization and malevolent outgroup attributions. The strategies draw on narrative theorizing and intergroup contact theory. Our intervention is low cost and can be effectively administrated in educational settings to combat the deleterious effects of political polarization. In this four-group between-subjects randomized experiment (n = 179), we found that a first-person perspective taking narrative writing exercise and a common ingroup cooperative narrative writing exercise both reduced political polarization and, thereby, reduced malevolent outgroup attributions. Our results revealed that both activities improved affect toward and perceived similarity with a noxious member of the political outgroup and, as a result, reduced affective political polarization. We discuss the theoretical and applied implications of our findings and encourage educators to adopt activities modeled after our interventions in their classrooms.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0090-9882
1479-5752
DOI:10.1080/00909882.2020.1789195