Detection of Feigned Crime-Related Amnesia: A Multi-Method Approach
Claims of crime-related amnesia appear to be common. Using a mock crime approach, the diagnostic power of seven symptom validity instruments was investigated. Sixty participants were assigned to three conditions: responding honestly; feigning crime-related amnesia; feigning amnesia with a warning no...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Journal of forensic psychology practice Vol. 10; no. 5; pp. 440 - 463 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        Binghamton, NY
          Taylor & Francis Group
    
        29.10.2010
     Haworth Press  | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 1522-8932 1522-9092  | 
| DOI | 10.1080/15228932.2010.489875 | 
Cover
| Summary: | Claims of crime-related amnesia appear to be common. Using a mock crime approach, the diagnostic power of seven symptom validity instruments was investigated. Sixty participants were assigned to three conditions: responding honestly; feigning crime-related amnesia; feigning amnesia with a warning not to exaggerate. High sensitivity and specificity were obtained for the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology, the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test, and the Morel Emotional Numbing Test. Only three warned malingerers went undetected. The results demonstrate that validated instruments exist to support forensic decision making about crime-related amnesia. Yet, warning may undermine their effectiveness, even when using a multi-method approach. | 
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1522-8932 1522-9092  | 
| DOI: | 10.1080/15228932.2010.489875 |