Detection of Feigned Crime-Related Amnesia: A Multi-Method Approach
Claims of crime-related amnesia appear to be common. Using a mock crime approach, the diagnostic power of seven symptom validity instruments was investigated. Sixty participants were assigned to three conditions: responding honestly; feigning crime-related amnesia; feigning amnesia with a warning no...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of forensic psychology practice Vol. 10; no. 5; pp. 440 - 463 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Binghamton, NY
Taylor & Francis Group
29.10.2010
Haworth Press |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1522-8932 1522-9092 |
| DOI | 10.1080/15228932.2010.489875 |
Cover
| Summary: | Claims of crime-related amnesia appear to be common. Using a mock crime approach, the diagnostic power of seven symptom validity instruments was investigated. Sixty participants were assigned to three conditions: responding honestly; feigning crime-related amnesia; feigning amnesia with a warning not to exaggerate. High sensitivity and specificity were obtained for the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology, the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test, and the Morel Emotional Numbing Test. Only three warned malingerers went undetected. The results demonstrate that validated instruments exist to support forensic decision making about crime-related amnesia. Yet, warning may undermine their effectiveness, even when using a multi-method approach. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1522-8932 1522-9092 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15228932.2010.489875 |