Detection of Feigned Crime-Related Amnesia: A Multi-Method Approach

Claims of crime-related amnesia appear to be common. Using a mock crime approach, the diagnostic power of seven symptom validity instruments was investigated. Sixty participants were assigned to three conditions: responding honestly; feigning crime-related amnesia; feigning amnesia with a warning no...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of forensic psychology practice Vol. 10; no. 5; pp. 440 - 463
Main Authors Giger, Peter, Merten, Thomas, Merckelbach, Harald, Oswald, Margit
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Binghamton, NY Taylor & Francis Group 29.10.2010
Haworth Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1522-8932
1522-9092
DOI10.1080/15228932.2010.489875

Cover

More Information
Summary:Claims of crime-related amnesia appear to be common. Using a mock crime approach, the diagnostic power of seven symptom validity instruments was investigated. Sixty participants were assigned to three conditions: responding honestly; feigning crime-related amnesia; feigning amnesia with a warning not to exaggerate. High sensitivity and specificity were obtained for the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology, the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test, and the Morel Emotional Numbing Test. Only three warned malingerers went undetected. The results demonstrate that validated instruments exist to support forensic decision making about crime-related amnesia. Yet, warning may undermine their effectiveness, even when using a multi-method approach.
ISSN:1522-8932
1522-9092
DOI:10.1080/15228932.2010.489875