There's a certain slant of light: Three attitudes toward the political turn in analytic philosophy

• Published in: Metaphilosophy Vol. 54; no. 2-3; pp. 324 - 340
• Main Authors: Almagro, Manuel, Guerra, Sergio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2023
• Subjects: Analytic philosophy; disagreement; Injustice; normativity; political turn; Politics
• ISSN: 0026-1068; 1467-9973
• DOI: 10.1111/meta.12619

There has been a growing interest within analytic philosophy in addressing political and social issues, which has been referred to as the “political turn” in the discipline. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it discusses the very characterization of the political turn. In particular, it introduces the definition proposed by Bordonaba‐Plou, Fernández‐Castro, and Torices, suggests that we should not consider the turn a form of activism, and explores an additional benefit of the ideal/nonideal distinction for characterizing the turn. Second, it addresses the concern of what attitude we should take in the face of the different sensitivities we might have with respect to what constitutes an injustice. Which philosophical works should count as part of the political turn? The paper explores three different attitudes toward this dilemma, and favors what it calls the revisionist attitude, which emphasizes the fact that our perception of injustice is subject to error.