Are urban visitors’ general preferences for green-spaces similar to their preferences when seeking stress relief?
•Urban green-space visitors’ general preferences for green-space characteristics are similar to their site preferences when seeking stress relief.•For stress relief respondents placed more importance on visitor numbers.•Litter and trail environment played a larger role in general preferences.•User c...
Saved in:
Published in | Urban forestry & urban greening Vol. 14; no. 4; pp. 872 - 882 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier GmbH
2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1618-8667 1610-8167 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.005 |
Cover
Summary: | •Urban green-space visitors’ general preferences for green-space characteristics are similar to their site preferences when seeking stress relief.•For stress relief respondents placed more importance on visitor numbers.•Litter and trail environment played a larger role in general preferences.•User conflicts and crowding seem to play a more important role for stated stress-relief preferences.•The stress-relief preferences of respondents did not differ remarkably subject to their own reported stress level.
Many urban societies are faced with a growing incidence of poor health because of mental stress and sedentary lifestyles. Urban green spaces are increasingly seen as a counter to hectic city living and as restorative settings. This study investigates the preferences for site characteristics green-space visitors have when they are seeking stress relief compared to their general green-space preferences. This study developed a conceptual framework integrating physical and social characteristics of different green-space types in Vienna, Austria and investigated the preferences of 692 on-site visitors. A stated choice model with digitally calibrated images found that visitors’ general preferences are similar to their site preferences when seeking stress relief. However, for stress relief, visitor numbers played a more important role in their green-space choices, while litter and trail environment played a larger role in general preferences. The stress-relief preferences of respondents did not differ remarkably subject to their own reported stress level. Recommendations for green-space planning are derived. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1618-8667 1610-8167 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.005 |