A Case for a Naturalistic Perspective

This paper continues the debate on a unifying theory of the human-companion animal bond, begun in the first volume of Anthrozoös by Kidd and Kidd (1987:140-57). Research is cited in which the relationship between people and the dog is the case study. It is argued that the animal-animal model may not...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnthrozoös Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 5 - 8
Main Author Paxton, David W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Routledge 01.03.2000
Subjects
animal models
case studies
coevolution
dogs
empirical research
humans
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0892-7936
1753-0377
1753-0377
DOI10.2752/089279300786999996

Cover

More Information
Summary:This paper continues the debate on a unifying theory of the human-companion animal bond, begun in the first volume of Anthrozoös by Kidd and Kidd (1987:140-57). Research is cited in which the relationship between people and the dog is the case study. It is argued that the animal-animal model may not be discounted when developing theory on the relationship between human beings and the dog. An example is offered of a naturalistic perspective which implements the animal/animal model. In this perspective, the relationship between human beings and dogs is seen as a co-evolved, complex biological interdependency. Because human beings and dogs are aspects of each other, empirical analysis of the relationship may be confounded. It is recommended that the human relationship with other animals be considered using a naturalistic perspective.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0892-7936
1753-0377
1753-0377
DOI:10.2752/089279300786999996