Towards resolving the evolutionary history of Caucasian pears (Pyrus, Rosaceae)—Phylogenetic relationships, divergence times and leaf trait evolution

• Published in: Journal of systematics and evolution : JSE Vol. 56; no. 1; pp. 35 - 47
• Main Authors: Korotkova, Nadja, Parolly, Gerald, Khachatryan, Anahit, Ghulikyan, Lusine, Sargsyan, Harutyun, Akopian, Janna, Borsch, Thomas, Gruenstaeudl, Michael
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Beijing Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2018
• Subjects: Adaptation; Asia; Biological evolution; Caucasus; Caucasus region; Divergence; ecoregions; Endemic species; Europe; Evolution; forests; habitats; indigenous species; leaf shape; Leaves; monophyly; morphological characters; paleogeography; Pears; Phylogenetics; Phylogeny; Pyrus; Taxa; taxonomy; White people; Woodlands; Asia; Caucasus region; Europe
• ISSN: 1674-4918; 1759-6831
• DOI: 10.1111/jse.12276

With approximately 25 endemic species, the genus Pyrus (pears) is highly diverse in the Caucasus ecoregion. The majority of Caucasian pears inhabit xerophytic open woodlands or similar habitats, to which they display morphological adaptations, such as narrow leaves. The other species, both Caucasian and non‐Caucasian taxa, mainly inhabit mesophytic forests and display broad leaves. Using a representative taxon sampling of Pyrus from the Caucasus, Europe and Asia, we reconstruct phylogenetic relationships in the genus based on multiple plastid regions. We also estimate the divergence times of major clades in Pyrus, reconstruct the evolution of leaf shapes, and discuss the emergence of xeromorphic leaf traits. Our results confirm the monophyly of Pyrus and the existence of two major clades: (a) an E Asian clade with a crown group age of 15.7 (24.02–8.37 95% HPD) My, and (b) a W Eurasian clade that comprises species from Europe, SW Asia and the Caucasus and that displays a slightly younger crown group of 12.38 (19.02–6.41 95% HPD) My. The existing infrageneric classification of Pyrus was found partially incongruent with the inferred phylogenetic trees. Several currently accepted species were not recovered as monophyletic, indicating that current species limits require re‐evaluation. Ancestral character state reconstructions revealed several independent transitions from broad‐ to narrow‐shaped leaves in Pyrus, probably via intermediate‐shaped leaves.