Seed movement in small‐scale vegetation restoration

Summary Quantifying ecological interactions can inform restoration practitioners of the recovery of ecosystem function in restored areas. Plant–animal interactions that move seeds are critical for plant recruitment, animal food sources and ecosystem function, but seed movement immediately after sowi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEcological management & restoration Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 274 - 279
Main Authors Elliott, Carole P, Commander, Lucy E, Williams, Matthew R, Golos, Peter J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Canberra Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1442-7001
1442-8903
DOI10.1111/emr.12516

Cover

More Information
Summary:Summary Quantifying ecological interactions can inform restoration practitioners of the recovery of ecosystem function in restored areas. Plant–animal interactions that move seeds are critical for plant recruitment, animal food sources and ecosystem function, but seed movement immediately after sowing can affect calculations of seedling emergence in restored areas. We set up seed cafeterias in undisturbed, native vegetation and restored areas to quantify and compare the removal of seeds of eight native plant species of banded ironstone ranges to determine the recovery of this ecological interaction and the potential effect on monitoring protocols. Overall, the average amounts of seeds removed from cafeterias over two days were between 17 and 23%, but this varied considerably between replicates. Seeds with or without a food body (i.e. elaiosome) were both removed from cafeterias by invertebrates. Seeds removed by invertebrates (most likely ants) after surface sowing for restoration are expected to negatively affect calculations of seedling emergence because the known quantity of sown seeds has been reduced, deflating emergence calculations. Restoration protocols should consider the potential negative effect of seed movement on seedling emergence. Encouragingly, these restoration areas have maintained ecological interactions that move seeds in the landscape at comparable levels to undisturbed vegetation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1442-7001
1442-8903
DOI:10.1111/emr.12516