The M.A.STE.R.S algorithm for acute visual loss management after facial filler injection

Objective To propose an algorithm of treatment for sudden visual loss following filler injections and perform an English‐written literature search for assignment of evidence level and grade recommendation. Methods Algorithm of treatment includes ocular physical Maneuvers, hyAluronidase administratio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cosmetic dermatology Vol. 19; no. 11; pp. 2859 - 2866
Main Authors Graue, Gerardo, Ochoa Araujo, Dora Aline, Plata Palazuelos, Cristina, Núñez Medrano, Juan Ángel, López San Juan, Fernando José, Sánchez Pereda, Daniela, Capiz Correa, Daniel Raúl, Velasco, Leopoldo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.11.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1473-2130
1473-2165
1473-2165
DOI10.1111/jocd.13393

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective To propose an algorithm of treatment for sudden visual loss following filler injections and perform an English‐written literature search for assignment of evidence level and grade recommendation. Methods Algorithm of treatment includes ocular physical Maneuvers, hyAluronidase administration, intravenous STEroids, intraocular pressure Reduction, and Supplemental Oxygen (M.A.STE .R.S) based on previous acute management reports. Special consideration for algorithm buildup was made for ophthalmic diseases that share physiopathological features such as central retinal artery occlusion, systemic vasculitis affecting vision, and acute glaucoma. Finally, a systematic cross‐review of the reported cases with visual loss was done to identify the level of evidence and grant a recommendation grade. Results A search through PubMed and Medscape databases for English‐written scientific papers using the terms facial filler, retinal artery occlusion, management, treatment, complications, and adverse events quoted a total of 46 papers (190 cases) which were then analyzed. A high variability on management for treatment of sudden visual loss after facial filler injections was observed. This was attributed partially to the great diversity of medical specialists performing cosmetic facial procedures such as dermatologists, plastic surgeons, esthetic doctors and ophthalmologists, and the lack of high evidence level studies. Conclusions The proposed algorithm provides an initial guideline based on prior literature reports and physiopathology involving facial filler injection complications. Analysis identified 22 successfully treated cases with vision recovery (11.57%). Ocular physical maneuvers had the best evidence‐based level and grade recommendation (A) for the management of acute vision loss secondary to facial filler injections.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1473-2130
1473-2165
1473-2165
DOI:10.1111/jocd.13393