Prediction Model of Intradialytic Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients Based on Machine Learning

The escalating global burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly end-stage renal disease (ESRD), has intensified reliance on hemodialysis (HD), imposing substantial financial and operational burdens on healthcare systems and patients. Intradialytic hypertension (IDH), a critical complicati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical systems Vol. 49; no. 1; p. 112
Main Authors Wang, Yu, Zhou, Hongming, Guo, Qi, Wang, Kang, Luo, Yehua, Luan, Shaodong, Tang, Donge, Dong, Shuangyong, Yin, Lianghong, Dai, Yong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 11.09.2025
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1573-689X
0148-5598
1573-689X
DOI10.1007/s10916-025-02237-5

Cover

More Information
Summary:The escalating global burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly end-stage renal disease (ESRD), has intensified reliance on hemodialysis (HD), imposing substantial financial and operational burdens on healthcare systems and patients. Intradialytic hypertension (IDH), a critical complication during HD, is associated with life-threatening cardiovascular and neurological sequelae if unmanaged. This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML)-driven early-alert system for IDH risk prediction by integrating demographic profiles and dialysis session records, enabling clinicians to preemptively identify high-risk patients and prioritize targeted monitoring. Two clinical prediction models (IDH-1 and IDH-2) were developed using Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and TabNet algorithms. IDH-1 estimates immediate hypertension risk by analyzing pre-dialysis vital signs and longitudinal treatment patterns, whereas IDH-2 predicts subsequent session risks by synthesizing real-time dialysis parameters with historical biomarkers. Model performance was rigorously validated using standardized metrics, including AUC-ROC, sensitivity, accuracy, and F1 score, to ensure clinical applicability. 185,125 HD sessions as training set and 71,427 sessions as testing set were used in this study. For IDH-1, the LGBM model demonstrated superior discriminative capacity (AUC: 0.87; recall: 0.73; F1 score: 0.36), outperforming SVM and TabNet. Similarly, LGBM achieved the highest performance for IDH-2 (AUC: 0.74; recall: 0.56; F1 score: 0.26). Most significant parameters in IDH-1 Predictor with LGBM were pre-dialysis diastolic pressures, historical mean arterial pressure, and historical average IDH episodes. For the IDH-2 model with LGBM, historical average IDH episodes and post-dialysis systolic pressures were most important parameters. This study provides two kinds of superior discriminative capacity LGBM model for IDH predicting. The proposed models offer a scalable framework for personalized risk stratification, potentially mitigating adverse outcomes in hemodialysis populations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1573-689X
0148-5598
1573-689X
DOI:10.1007/s10916-025-02237-5