Respiration Rate Measurement Under 1-D Body Motion Using Single Continuous-Wave Doppler Radar Vital Sign Detection System

Random body movement (RBM) is one of the most challenging issues in non-contact vital sign detection using Doppler radar technique. The large and irregular displacement of the human body could corrupt the vital sign signal and significantly degrade the accuracy of detection. Even the respiration rat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques Vol. 64; no. 6; pp. 1937 - 1946
Main Authors Tu, Jianxuan, Hwang, Taesong, Lin, Jenshan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.06.2016
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0018-9480
1557-9670
DOI10.1109/TMTT.2016.2560159

Cover

More Information
Summary:Random body movement (RBM) is one of the most challenging issues in non-contact vital sign detection using Doppler radar technique. The large and irregular displacement of the human body could corrupt the vital sign signal and significantly degrade the accuracy of detection. Even the respiration rate (RR) sometimes cannot be measured accurately under RBM. In this paper, the characteristic of the frequency spectrum of the vital sign signal under body motion (the motion modulation effect) is analyzed. Based on that effect, an RR measurement method under one-dimensional (1-D) body motion is developed using only one non-contact continuous-wave (CW) Doppler radar vital sign detection system. The direction of body motion is extracted along with the new position of the respiration peaks in the frequency spectrum and RR can be calculated. Simulations of the theory using a model of the vital sign detection system are performed, followed by experiments to verify the theory. Experiments are performed on an actuator and a human subject by only one 5.8-GHz non-contact CW vital sign detection system. Under large 1-D body motion that has a displacement 5-10 times larger than the respiratory displacement, the proposed method successfully measures RR with only 7.15% error.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0018-9480
1557-9670
DOI:10.1109/TMTT.2016.2560159