The clinical ability of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to predict treatment outcomes for lumbar facet joint pain

Several radiologic imaging techniques have been used to predict the effects of treatment on lumbar facet joint (LFJ) pain. However, there are no reports on the use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of LFJ pain. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the clin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of palliative medicine Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 1431 - 1437
Main Authors Chang, Min Cheol, Yi, You Gyoung, Yang, Hea-Eun, Lee, Jang Ho, Kim, Ji Hwan, Do, Kyung Hee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published China 01.02.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2224-5820
2224-5839
DOI10.21037/apm-20-313

Cover

More Information
Summary:Several radiologic imaging techniques have been used to predict the effects of treatment on lumbar facet joint (LFJ) pain. However, there are no reports on the use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of LFJ pain. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical ability of contrast-enhanced MRI to predict treatment outcomes for LFJ pain. A total of 26 patients with LFJ pain were recruited and intraarticular (IA) corticosteroid injections were administered to each patient. We assessed the treatment outcomes using a numerical rating scale (NRS), and two radiologists independently investigated LFJ enhancement and osteoarthritis grading. No serious complications or adverse events were reported. IA corticosteroid injections were administered to 26 patients (12 women and 14 men; mean age: 65.19±11.05 years) with LFJ pain. Among the 26 patients, 16 patients were included in the facet joints with enhancement group, and the remaining 10 patients were included in the facet joints with non-enhancement group, based on contrast-enhanced MRI scans. In both the enhancement and non-enhancement groups, NRS scores significantly decreased at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment (P<0.05). However, we saw no significant difference between the groups from pretreatment to three months after treatment (P>0.05). The routine use of contrast-enhanced MRI is not recommended in patients with LFJ pain.
ISSN:2224-5820
2224-5839
DOI:10.21037/apm-20-313