Understanding immunotherapy terminology: An analysis of provider‐patient conversations
Background Immunotherapy terminology is complex and can be difficult for patients to understand, threatening informed consent. The aims of this exploratory study are to determine whether patients understand immunotherapy terminology and if the provider defining the term improves patient understandin...
Saved in:
Published in | Immunomedicine Vol. 1; no. 2 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
Wiley
01.12.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2510-5345 2510-5345 |
DOI | 10.1002/imed.1028 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
Immunotherapy terminology is complex and can be difficult for patients to understand, threatening informed consent. The aims of this exploratory study are to determine whether patients understand immunotherapy terminology and if the provider defining the term improves patient understanding. Good patient/provider communication is important for good informed consent, patient adherence to treatment and patient outcomes.
Methods
Conversations between oncology providers and patients discussing immunotherapy were observed (n = 39), and technical terms used were noted. With consent, patients were interviewed post‐conversation to assess their understanding of these terms (n = 39). Comparisons of the terms were conducted using chi‐square tests, Fisher's exact tests, or ANOVA where appropriate.
Results
“Immunotherapy” was the most difficult for participants to understand with 48.7% (19/39) correctly defining immunotherapy. “Immunotherapy agents” was understood 53.8% (14/26) of the time. “Immune system” was well understood 88.5% (23/26). Providers defined immunotherapy in 97.4% of conversations. There was no correlation between having immunotherapy defined in the conversation, and the likelihood of a correct definition (p = 0.487). “Immune system” was defined in 92.3% of conversations (n = 26), and defining it in the conversation was correlated with increased patient understanding (p = 0.009).
Conclusion
Our results indicate that patients have difficulty understanding some immunotherapy terminology. Since patient understanding of key terminology is crucial for informed consent and patient care, it is essential to implement interventions to improve understanding. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Author Contributions: Shannon Blee- Investigation, Writing original draft; Bari Rosenburg-Investigation, Methodology, Writing-reviewing and editing; Jeffery M. Switchenko- Formal analysis, methodology, Writing-reviewing and editing; Rachel Hianik- Investigation, Methodology, Writing-review and editing; Mary Catherine Thomson- Investigation, Methodology, Writing-reviewing and editing; Margie Dixon- Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Project administrator, Writing-reviewing and editing; Mehmet Asim Bilen- Resources, Methodology; Writing-reviewing and editing; Rebecca D. Pentz- Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing-editing and reviewing. |
ISSN: | 2510-5345 2510-5345 |
DOI: | 10.1002/imed.1028 |