Is there any value in measuring faecal calprotectin in Clostridium difficile positive faecal samples?

Markers of intestinal inflammation have been proposed for inclusion in Clostridium difficile diagnostic algorithms. Faecal calprotectin (f-Cp), a sensitive marker of intestinal inflammation, was evaluated for utility in C. difficile diagnosis in the hospital setting. One hundred and twenty C. diffic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical microbiology Vol. 63; no. 4; pp. 590 - 593
Main Authors Whitehead, Simon J., Shipman, Kate E., Cooper, Mike, Ford, Clare, Gama, Rousseau
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Reading Society for General Microbiology 01.04.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-2615
1473-5644
1473-5644
DOI10.1099/jmm.0.067389-0

Cover

More Information
Summary:Markers of intestinal inflammation have been proposed for inclusion in Clostridium difficile diagnostic algorithms. Faecal calprotectin (f-Cp), a sensitive marker of intestinal inflammation, was evaluated for utility in C. difficile diagnosis in the hospital setting. One hundred and twenty C. difficile positive and 99 C. difficile negative faecal samples of hospital-acquired diarrhoea were analysed for f-Cp using a quantitative ELISA. C. difficile positivity was confirmed using ELISAs for either toxins ( n  = 45) or glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) with toxin gene confirmation ( n  = 75). Non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis) was used for data analysis. C. difficile positive samples had higher ( P <0.05) median (interquartile range) f-Cp levels; 336 µg g −1 (208–536) for toxin and 249 µg g −1 (155–498) for GDH and toxin gene positive compared with 106 µg g −1 (46–176) for C. difficile and culture-negative faecal samples. Five C. difficile positive samples were f-Cp negative (<50 µg g −1 ). A f-Cp concentration >50 µg g −1 was 96 % sensitive and 26 % specific for C. difficile , with area under the ROC curve of 0.82. There is no role for f-CP alone in predicting C. difficile infection in hospital-acquired diarrhoea due to its low specificity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-2615
1473-5644
1473-5644
DOI:10.1099/jmm.0.067389-0