Flies (Insecta, Diptera) collected in the environment of dairy farms as carriers of Rotavirus A and betacoronavirus

We aimed to investigate the prevalence of rotavirus and coronavirus in dipterans that commonly inhabit the environment of dairy farms. We collected 217 insect specimens from nine dairy farms, which were examined through hemi-nested RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing in search of VP1 and N genes fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied microbiology Vol. 134; no. 3
Main Authors Bertolini, Amanda Bezerra, Thyssen, Patrícia Jacqueline, Brandão, Paulo Eduardo, Prado, Aline Marrara, Silva, Sheila Oliveira de Souza, Mioni, Mateus de Souza Ribeiro, de Gouvea, Fábio Lucas Rezende, Pantoja, José Carlos de Figueiredo, Langoni, Helio, Guimarães, Felipe Freitas, Joaquim, Sâmea Fernandes, Guerra, Simony Trevizan, Leite, Domingos da Silva, Rall, Vera Mores, Hernandes, Rodrigo Tavanelli, Lucheis, Simone Baldini, Rossi, Gabriel Augusto Marques, Ribeiro, Márcio Garcia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.03.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1365-2672
1364-5072
1365-2672
DOI10.1093/jambio/lxad020

Cover

More Information
Summary:We aimed to investigate the prevalence of rotavirus and coronavirus in dipterans that commonly inhabit the environment of dairy farms. We collected 217 insect specimens from nine dairy farms, which were examined through hemi-nested RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing in search of VP1 and N genes for rotavirus and bovine coronavirus-BCoV, respectively. With a predominance of Muscidae (152/217 = 70%) 11 families of Diptera were identified. Rotavirus A (RVA) and betacoronavirus (BCoV) were detected in 14.7% (32/217) and 4.6% (10/217) of the dipterans, respectively. Sequencing of the amplicons was possible for 11.5% (25/217) of RVA and 0.5% (1/217) of BCoV, confirming the presence of these pathogens. Our findings highlight the role of dipterans as carriers of RVA and BCoV of great relevance for public and animal health.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1365-2672
1364-5072
1365-2672
DOI:10.1093/jambio/lxad020