Zigzag Codes: MDS Array Codes With Optimal Rebuilding

Maximum distance separable (MDS) array codes are widely used in storage systems to protect data against erasures. We address the rebuilding ratio problem, namely, in the case of erasures, what is the fraction of the remaining information that needs to be accessed in order to rebuild exactly the lost...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on information theory Vol. 59; no. 3; pp. 1597 - 1616
Main Authors Tamo, I., Zhiying Wang, Bruck, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY IEEE 01.03.2013
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0018-9448
1557-9654
DOI10.1109/TIT.2012.2227110

Cover

More Information
Summary:Maximum distance separable (MDS) array codes are widely used in storage systems to protect data against erasures. We address the rebuilding ratio problem, namely, in the case of erasures, what is the fraction of the remaining information that needs to be accessed in order to rebuild exactly the lost information? It is clear that when the number of erasures equals the maximum number of erasures that an MDS code can correct, then the rebuilding ratio is 1 (access all the remaining information). However, the interesting and more practical case is when the number of erasures is smaller than the erasure correcting capability of the code. For example, consider an MDS code that can correct two erasures: What is the smallest amount of information that one needs to access in order to correct a single erasure? Previous work showed that the rebuilding ratio is bounded between [1/2] and [3/4]; however, the exact value was left as an open problem. In this paper, we solve this open problem and prove that for the case of a single erasure with a two-erasure correcting code, the rebuilding ratio is [1/2]. In general, we construct a new family of r -erasure correcting MDS array codes that has optimal rebuilding ratio of [1/( r )] in the case of a single erasure. Our array codes have efficient encoding and decoding algorithms (for the cases r =2 and r =3, they use a finite field of size 3 and 4, respectively) and an optimal update property.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0018-9448
1557-9654
DOI:10.1109/TIT.2012.2227110