Optimization design of centrifugal pump cavitation performance based on the improved BP neural network algorithm

•Identified key geometric parameters affecting cavitation via Plackett-Burman design.•Built a sample space using numerical simulation and Latin hypercube sampling.•Developed an adaptive genetic-BP algorithm for enhanced design efficiency.•Shown significant performance improvements in optimized pumps...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMeasurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation Vol. 245; p. 116553
Main Authors Wang, Yuqin, Shao, Jiale, Yang, Fan, Zhu, Qingzhuo, Zuo, Mengqiang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 15.03.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0263-2241
DOI10.1016/j.measurement.2024.116553

Cover

More Information
Summary:•Identified key geometric parameters affecting cavitation via Plackett-Burman design.•Built a sample space using numerical simulation and Latin hypercube sampling.•Developed an adaptive genetic-BP algorithm for enhanced design efficiency.•Shown significant performance improvements in optimized pumps, reducing cavitation and noise. A novel approach was proposed to tackle the problem of cavitation in centrifugal pumps during operation, which resulted in reduced performance and equipment breakdown. By analyzing the cavitation mechanism and key impeller parameters, the sample space was successfully constructed using numerical simulations and Latin hypercube sampling. An adaptive genetic-Back Propagation (BP) neural network algorithm was designed, combining the global search advantage of the genetic algorithm with the local optimization characteristics of the BP neural network, thereby improving optimization efficiency and accuracy. The experiment verified the significant effect of this method in improving the cavitation resistance performance of centrifugal pumps and reducing noise, which has important theoretical and practical value for the research and design of pump equipment.
ISSN:0263-2241
DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2024.116553