Determination of forest canopy cover of different sized stands with diverse structure using ALS data: case study of the Białowieża Forest (Poland)

The need for objective methods to determine tree canopy cover (CC) across large numbers of stands has led to the development of techniques that utilise airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, which provides a reproducible and detailed representation of canopy geometry. We developed a method for determin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScandinavian journal of forest research Vol. 39; no. 6; pp. 310 - 319
Main Authors Tracz, Wiktor, Miścicki, Stanisław, Krok, Grzegorz, Magnuson, Robert, Stereńczak, Krzysztof
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oslo Taylor & Francis 17.08.2024
Taylor & Francis LLC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0282-7581
1651-1891
1651-1891
DOI10.1080/02827581.2024.2418115

Cover

More Information
Summary:The need for objective methods to determine tree canopy cover (CC) across large numbers of stands has led to the development of techniques that utilise airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, which provides a reproducible and detailed representation of canopy geometry. We developed a method for determining CC area and evaluated the estimation accuracy for stands of different sizes, structure and composition. This method is based on tree crown geometries obtained from ALS data, and verified with field measurements using data for 3245 stands of the Białowieża Forest District in Poland. In relatively large stands (3-5 ha), the theoretical error of prediction decreased from 0.13 to 0.10 with increasing stand area. In stands larger than 10 ha, however, the error in estimating CC was less than ±0.10. Although every estimation method comes with its own assumptions and errors, the presented method eliminates the subjectivity in observer bias prevalent in traditional field-based ocular assessments and provides a more transparent and methodologically uniform approach for estimating CC in forests.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0282-7581
1651-1891
1651-1891
DOI:10.1080/02827581.2024.2418115