Research to order: Dilemmas in the design and control of tenant satisfaction surveys

There is widespread use of consumer surveys in the welfare field, in particular in social housing, and yet there are considerable conceptual problems about the meaning of satisfaction and how it might be measured. Moreover, such surveys are typically motivated by purposes which conflict with one ano...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of social research methodology Vol. 2; no. 4; pp. 279 - 296
Main Author Gubbay, Jon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 1999
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1364-5579
1464-5300
DOI10.1080/136455799294961

Cover

More Information
Summary:There is widespread use of consumer surveys in the welfare field, in particular in social housing, and yet there are considerable conceptual problems about the meaning of satisfaction and how it might be measured. Moreover, such surveys are typically motivated by purposes which conflict with one another and thereby threaten the validity of the research in respect of each or all of those purposes. The analysis draws on the author's experience of conducting tenant satisfaction research, examination of an indicative sample of such studies and interviews with responsible officials of housing associations. Both through theorizing the social and political context of satisfaction surveys and appealing to real life examples, the author attempts to show that the key predicaments derive from the fact that social landlords operate in markets oriented to tenants and markets oriented to creditors and regulators and that they have to combine both roles of trustee and of business. Implications are spelled out with regard to the researcher-landlord relationship, research methods, modes of analysis and publication. It is noted that there are pressures for both landlords and researchers to collude in giving the impression that the researcher is independent, whereas the reality may be somewhat different.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1364-5579
1464-5300
DOI:10.1080/136455799294961