The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines

• Published in: Nature machine intelligence Vol. 1; no. 9; pp. 389 - 399
• Main Authors: Jobin, Anna, Ienca, Marcello, Vayena, Effy
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.09.2019; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 4000/4008; 4007/438/179; 4014/4045; 639/705/258; 706/689/179; Artificial intelligence; Best practice; Bias; Convergence; Data analysis; Engineering; Ethical standards; Ethics; Grey literature; Guidelines; International organizations; Perspective; Principles; Privacy; Questions; Research facilities; Search engines; Search strategies; United Kingdom > UK; Singapore
• ISSN: 2522-5839; 2522-5839
• DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

In the past five years, private companies, research institutions and public sector organizations have issued principles and guidelines for ethical artificial intelligence (AI). However, despite an apparent agreement that AI should be ‘ethical’, there is debate about both what constitutes ‘ethical AI’ and which ethical requirements, technical standards and best practices are needed for its realization. To investigate whether a global agreement on these questions is emerging, we mapped and analysed the current corpus of principles and guidelines on ethical AI. Our results reveal a global convergence emerging around five ethical principles (transparency, justice and fairness, non-maleficence, responsibility and privacy), with substantive divergence in relation to how these principles are interpreted, why they are deemed important, what issue, domain or actors they pertain to, and how they should be implemented. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating guideline-development efforts with substantive ethical analysis and adequate implementation strategies. As AI technology develops rapidly, it is widely recognized that ethical guidelines are required for safe and fair implementation in society. But is it possible to agree on what is ‘ethical AI’? A detailed analysis of 84 AI ethics reports around the world, from national and international organizations, companies and institutes, explores this question, finding a convergence around core principles but substantial divergence on practical implementation.