Epistemic logic with partial grasp
We have to gain from recognizing a relation between epistemic agents and the parts of subject matters that play a role in their cognitive lives. I call this relation “grasping”. Namely, I zone in on one notion of having a partial grasp of a subject matter—that of agents grasping part of the subject...
Saved in:
Published in | Synthese (Dordrecht) Vol. 204; no. 3; p. 92 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
29.08.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1573-0964 0039-7857 1573-0964 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11229-024-04738-1 |
Cover
Summary: | We have to gain from recognizing a relation between epistemic agents and the parts of subject matters that play a role in their cognitive lives. I call this relation “grasping”. Namely, I zone in on one notion of having a partial grasp of a subject matter—that of agents grasping part of the subject matter that they are attending to—and characterize it. I propose that giving up the idealization that we fully grasp the subject matters we attend to allows one to more realistically characterize the epistemic life of agents. To show this, I propose an epistemic logic with partial grasp that has in mind considerations from first-order aboutness theory with the aim of avoiding certain forms of logical omniscience, and which provides an alternative to immanent closure (Yablo Aboutness, Princeton University Press, 2014). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1573-0964 0039-7857 1573-0964 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11229-024-04738-1 |