Causal relationship between key genes and metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease risk mediated by immune cells: A Mendelian randomization and mediation analysis

Aim Non‐invasive diagnostics for metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) remain challenging. We aimed to identify novel key genes as non‐invasive biomarkers for MAFLD, elucidate causal relationships between biomarkers and MAFLD and determine the role of immune cells as potential...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes, obesity & metabolism Vol. 26; no. 12; pp. 5590 - 5599
Main Authors Feng, Gong, He, Na, Gao, Jing, Li, Xiao‐Cheng, Zhang, Fen‐Na, Liu, Cheng‐Cheng, Targher, Giovanni, Byrne, Christopher D., Mi, Man, Zheng, Ming‐Hua, Ye, Feng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2024
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI10.1111/dom.15925

Cover

More Information
Summary:Aim Non‐invasive diagnostics for metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) remain challenging. We aimed to identify novel key genes as non‐invasive biomarkers for MAFLD, elucidate causal relationships between biomarkers and MAFLD and determine the role of immune cells as potential mediators. Materials and Methods Utilizing published transcriptome data of patients with biopsy‐proven MAFLD, we applied linear models for microarray data, least absolute shrinkage and selector operation (LASSO) regressions and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to identify and validate biomarkers for MAFLD. Using the expression quantitative trait loci database and a cohort of 778 614 Europeans, we used Mendelian randomization to analyse the causal relationships between key biomarkers and MAFLD. Additionally, mediation analysis was performed to examine the involvement of 731 immunophenotypes in these relationships. Results We identified 31 differentially expressed genes, and LASSO regression showed three hub genes, IGFBP2, PEG10, and P4HA1, with area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.807, 0.772 and 0.791, respectively, for identifying MAFLD. The model of these three genes had an AUROC of 0.959 and 0.800 in the development and validation data sets, respectively. This model was also validated using serum‐based enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay data from MAFLD patients and control subjects (AUROC: 0.819, 95% confidence interval: 0.736–0.902). PEG10 was associated with an increased MAFLD risk (odds ratio = 1.106, p = 0.032) via inverse variance–weighted analysis, and about 30% of this risk was mediated by the percentage of CD11c + CD62L– monocytes. Conclusions The MAFLD panels have good diagnostic accuracy, and the causal link between PEG10 and MAFLD was mediated by the percentage of CD11c + CD62L– monocytes.
Bibliography:Gong Feng, Na He and Jing Gao have contributed equally to this study.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.15925